Merging vs Rebasing on a Small Team

Merging vs Rebasing on a Small Team

21 October 2026 · By Laravel Git · 1 min read

Few git arguments cost more than they settle. The working rule for a small team fits in one sentence: rebase your own branch, merge into main.

Rebase is for your branch#

While your branch is still yours, keep it current and readable:

git fetch origin
git rebase origin/main

Your commits replay on top of main, conflicts show up in small pieces while you still remember the change, and the branch reads like a story a reviewer can follow.

Merge is for main#

When the branch is done, merge it. The merge commit marks where the work landed and keeps the group’s shared history untouched:

git checkout main
git merge --no-ff pr-42-branch

--no-ff keeps the feature visible as one unit, which makes the changelog draft and any later revert much easier.

What not to do#

Never rebase a branch someone else has pulled. Rewriting shared history is how teammates lose work and trust the repo a little less. If it is pushed and shared, it merges.

That is the whole policy. Write it in the README and spend the argument on the code instead.

Share this post

Our network